<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Experiments with the 70-300</title>
	<atom:link href="http://winterwoman.net/2008/05/13/more-experiments-with-the-70-300/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://winterwoman.net/2008/05/13/more-experiments-with-the-70-300/</link>
	<description>WinterWoman&#039;s Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:02:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam R. Paul</title>
		<link>http://winterwoman.net/2008/05/13/more-experiments-with-the-70-300/#comment-2193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam R. Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 14:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winterwoman.wordpress.com/?p=390#comment-2193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like you&#039;re getting good results from the 70-300.  I rented the 100-400 once.  It&#039;s a nice lens, especially for bird photography - I see a lot of them in the popular birdy locations here.  It is in an entirely different league in terms of size and weight, though!  Being an &#039;L&#039; lens, color and contrast should be a bit better.  I wound up getting the 300mm f/4L IS (and a 1.4x converter) - a little smaller/lighter than the 100-400, and it&#039;s surprisingly good for flowers too, especially if you toss an extension tube into the mix.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like you&#8217;re getting good results from the 70-300.  I rented the 100-400 once.  It&#8217;s a nice lens, especially for bird photography &#8211; I see a lot of them in the popular birdy locations here.  It is in an entirely different league in terms of size and weight, though!  Being an &#8216;L&#8217; lens, color and contrast should be a bit better.  I wound up getting the 300mm f/4L IS (and a 1.4x converter) &#8211; a little smaller/lighter than the 100-400, and it&#8217;s surprisingly good for flowers too, especially if you toss an extension tube into the mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAve Cooney</title>
		<link>http://winterwoman.net/2008/05/13/more-experiments-with-the-70-300/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DAve Cooney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 12:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winterwoman.wordpress.com/?p=390#comment-2112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like your new format. 
Advantages of the 100-400 is its a stop faster and reaches a little farther. Disadvantage, it weighss a ton.

Dave]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like your new format.<br />
Advantages of the 100-400 is its a stop faster and reaches a little farther. Disadvantage, it weighss a ton.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cestoady</title>
		<link>http://winterwoman.net/2008/05/13/more-experiments-with-the-70-300/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cestoady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 03:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winterwoman.wordpress.com/?p=390#comment-2110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That 70 --300 lens is a dandy. It is allowing you to get some real exquisite photos -- sharp, good exposure,  and with excellent color saturation. I can appreciate your feelings about this lens -- go no further if you can manage to carry an extra lens.

 Since it is impossible for  one lens  to fit all situations -- having two that will cover most needs doesn&#039;t seem like a bad  option.  One can always carry the extra lens in a small fanny pack where it can be in reserve  yet readily accessible  should the need arise--  as it will sooner or later. 

PS. Is that a crow scolding you ??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That 70 &#8211;300 lens is a dandy. It is allowing you to get some real exquisite photos &#8212; sharp, good exposure,  and with excellent color saturation. I can appreciate your feelings about this lens &#8212; go no further if you can manage to carry an extra lens.</p>
<p> Since it is impossible for  one lens  to fit all situations &#8212; having two that will cover most needs doesn&#8217;t seem like a bad  option.  One can always carry the extra lens in a small fanny pack where it can be in reserve  yet readily accessible  should the need arise&#8211;  as it will sooner or later. </p>
<p>PS. Is that a crow scolding you ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toni</title>
		<link>http://winterwoman.net/2008/05/13/more-experiments-with-the-70-300/#comment-2108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toni]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 03:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winterwoman.wordpress.com/?p=390#comment-2108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a 70 - 300 and if I can get it to focus for me it&#039;s great.
It is a manual focus so sometimes my shots are not great.
your photos here look good]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 70 &#8211; 300 and if I can get it to focus for me it&#8217;s great.<br />
It is a manual focus so sometimes my shots are not great.<br />
your photos here look good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nina</title>
		<link>http://winterwoman.net/2008/05/13/more-experiments-with-the-70-300/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 01:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winterwoman.wordpress.com/?p=390#comment-2104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it look to me like you could like it, too!
I toy with the idea of getting something more--just don&#039;t know how to resolve the size issues.
I don&#039;t want to be weighted down and have to carry multiple bags whenever I go out.
Sometimes, even now, I envy those with the point and shoot that fits in the pocket.
How does it all seem?
Bulky or cumbersome at all?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it look to me like you could like it, too!<br />
I toy with the idea of getting something more&#8211;just don&#8217;t know how to resolve the size issues.<br />
I don&#8217;t want to be weighted down and have to carry multiple bags whenever I go out.<br />
Sometimes, even now, I envy those with the point and shoot that fits in the pocket.<br />
How does it all seem?<br />
Bulky or cumbersome at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://winterwoman.net/2008/05/13/more-experiments-with-the-70-300/#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winterwoman.wordpress.com/?p=390#comment-2103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like you&#039;re getting some nice results! I&#039;d really like to get some photography lessons some time so I could get better results. I really like the color and light you captured with the leaves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like you&#8217;re getting some nice results! I&#8217;d really like to get some photography lessons some time so I could get better results. I really like the color and light you captured with the leaves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

