Two Forest Projects

Really GorgeousI hiked the southern-most section of the Earl Cardot Eastside Overland Trail last Saturday with my dog Lolli and my friend Terry and his dog Mozart.  Parts of that section are really gorgeous.  Other parts are in transition.

In Transition

The section we hiked, from V – the very end – to S – about 2.5 miles, lies completely on property owned by Chautauqua County.  In the section between points U and T, there are signs posted by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that explain two different projects.

Explanation of the Timbering Project Forest Management Plan

 The first involves harvesting a mature plantation of Austrian Pine.  Here’s what the notice says:

Austrian Pine Closeup     In the 1940’s this was open field, whose fertility had been depleted by over 100 years of continuous farming.  That year, the State purchased this parcel of land and began the process of restoring it to a forested condition by planting Austrian pine at a spacing of 6′ X 6′.  Now the pines are not maintaining adequate growth on the heavy, poorly-drained clay loam, and will not respond to additional thinning.  Therefore, forestry staff decided to harvest and utilize these trees before they begin to die and blow down.  This stand will be harvested in a series of blocks.  Each block will be harvested one to two years apart.  This will create a variety of areas with different age classes of trees.  This type of cutting benefits Ruffed Grouse, Turkey, and White Tail Deer and many song bird species, while maintaining this area in continuous forest cover.  If you look closely there are already hardwood trees such as hard maple, red maple, white ash and black cherry starting as seedlings in the understory cover of the Austrian Pine.

Harvesting Pines - but Leaving the Hardwoods Behind

[…]

     The native hardwood trees that will grow here, after the Pine removal, are better suited to the soil conditions than the non-native pines, and will have more value for wildlife and timber as well.  The planted pines did serve an important purpose, however, by rapidly returning the field to forested cover and avoiding the thornapple/brush stage which can take over an old field for decades.

     Over the next 60 years, this will become a mature hardwood forest, and will have been thinned one or more times for firewood and other products.

The second project involves managing the forest for healthier trees and overall ecosystem health.  My photograph of the sign isn’t good enough for me to quote the sign exactly… We scared a Ruffed Grouse out of this brush pile!So let me give you the basics.  The purpose of the project is to improve the overall forest health and diversity.  Some old straggly trees with cavities are being left to provide wildlife habitat.  But mostly, they are taking out trees to provide more sunlight and less competition for some of the fine healthy-looking specimens.  Woody debris will be left on the forest floor so that when it decomposes it will return nutrients to the soil.  Also, the branches will protect new saplings from deer browse.  A few man-made structures will help protect water and soil resources – things line travel mats, culverts, and gravel for better drainage.

The trees targeted for removal in this project are marked with colorful paints, making for a strange looking woods:

More Projects - Blue

More Projects - Pink

Both of these projects can be found between points U and T on the Chautauqua County Trail Map.  If you park at U, you can hike south and avoid all the timbering.  If you want to hike north and still avoid the mess, stay on Harris Hill Road until you get to Point T, then head right (east) onto the trail.


Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Two Forest Projects

  1. Pingback: Eastside Overland Trail (V to S and Back) « Walking Home

  2. Quite a project at hand, will make life a bit messy for a while but it sure sounds like it is the right thing to do to benefit both human and wild life. Love the trail pics, looks like it was a tough hike tho!

  3. Projects of these kind are almost never needed for the health of the ecosystem, as forestry propaganda would have you believe. There is nothing better for wildlife and for the forest than naturally dying, thinning trees. Whether as standing dead snags or on the ground, dead trees are a gold mine of biodiversity, and are good for the soil, too.

  4. Dave, I pretty much agree with you about that… at least with regard to the second project. I respect the harvesting of the non-native trees for cash… and leaving the native hardwoods to re-seed, though.

  5. I am not sure that I would label any of the project explanations as “propaganda”unless one is adverse to ANY forest management. Forests can be managed to maximize diversity/or direct succession,as in the first project. Natural ecosystems operate on a different clock from that used in forest management — the point is to speed up the clock and plan for a specific outcome.

  6. Wow, that looks like some kind of mess out there in the woods, Jennifer! Were you aware of these projects before you started your hike?
    I’m wondering who’s going to be around for the next 60 years monitoring whether this project turns out as they’ve projected?

  7. @ cestoady – I can see benefits to management for some purposes… and I do agree with the harvest of the non-native pines. The other one, though… I’m having a hard tme seeing any true benefits… But… I’ve never been schooled in forestry, either…

    @ Ruthie – I was not aware of the projects! And, heck, I’m only 52 and plan to live until 120, so I’ll be around to keep an eye on them!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s